Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Short Quiz on Communism

COMMUNISM IS CREEPING IN ONE STEP AT A TIME, EXACTLY AS PLANNED.

Six trivia questions to see how much history you know. Be honest, it's kinda fun and revealing. If you don't know the answer make your best guess. Answer all the questions (no cheating) before looking at the answers.
 
Who said it?
 
1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
    A. Karl Marx
    B. Adolph Hitler
    C. Joseph Stalin
    D. None of the above



2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility,,,,,for shared prosperity."
    A. Lenin
    B. Mussolini
    C. Idi Amin
    D. None of the Above
 


3) "(We) .....can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
    A. Nikita Khrushev
    B. Josef Goebbels

    C. Boris Yeltsin
    D. None of the above



4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."
    A. Mao Tse Dung
    B. Hugo Chavez
    C. Kim Jong Il

    D. None of the above



5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
    A. Karl Marx
    B. Lenin
    C. Molotov
    D. None of the above
 


6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
    A. Pinochet
    B. Milosevic
    C. Saddam Hussein
    D. None of the above


Scroll down for answers


 
 
Answers
(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005
 
Wanna know something scary? She may be the next socialist president if you don't forward this to everyone that you know.
 

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Drowning Doesn’t Look Like Drowning


The new captain jumped from the deck, fully dressed, and sprinted through the water. A former lifeguard, he kept his eyes on his victim as he headed straight for the couple swimming between their anchored sportfisher and the beach. “I think he thinks you’re drowning,” the husband said to his wife. They had been splashing each other and she had screamed but now they were just standing, neck-deep on the sand bar. “We’re fine; what is he doing?” she asked, a little annoyed. “We’re fine!” the husband yelled, waving him off, but his captain kept swimming hard. ”Move!” he barked as he sprinted between the stunned owners. Directly behind them, not 10 feet away, their 9-year-old daughter was drowning. Safely above the surface in the arms of the captain, she burst into tears, “Daddy!”


How did this captain know—from 50 feet away—what the father couldn’t recognize from just 10? Drowning is not the violent, splashing call for help that most people expect. The captain was trained to recognize drowning by experts and years of experience. The father, on the other hand, had learned what drowning looks like by watching television. If you spend time on or near the water (hint: that’s all of us) then you should make sure that you and your crew know what to look for whenever people enter the water. Until she cried a tearful, “Daddy,” she hadn’t made a sound. As a former Coast Guard rescue swimmer, I wasn’t surprised at all by this story. Drowning is almost always a deceptively quiet event. The waving, splashing, and yelling that dramatic conditioning (television) prepares us to look for is rarely seen in real life.

The Instinctive Drowning Response—so named by Francesco A. Pia, Ph.D., is what people do to avoid actual or perceived suffocation in the water. And it does not look like most people expect. There is very little splashing, no waving, and no yelling or calls for help of any kind. To get an idea of just how quiet and undramatic from the surface drowning can be, consider this: It is the No. 2 cause of accidental death in children, ages 15 and under (just behind vehicle accidents)—of the approximately 750 children who will drown next year, about 375 of them will do so within 25 yards of a parent or other adult. In some of those drownings, the adult will actually watch the child do it, having no idea it is happening.* Drowning does not look like drowning—Dr. Pia, in an article in the Coast Guard’s On Scene magazine, described the Instinctive Drowning Response like this:
  1. “Except in rare circumstances, drowning people are physiologically unable to call out for help. The respiratory system was designed for breathing. Speech is the secondary or overlaid function. Breathing must be fulfilled before speech occurs.
  2. Drowning people’s mouths alternately sink below and reappear above the surface of the water. The mouths of drowning people are not above the surface of the water long enough for them to exhale, inhale, and call out for help. When the drowning people’s mouths are above the surface, they exhale and inhale quickly as their mouths start to sink below the surface of the water.
  3. Drowning people cannot wave for help. Nature instinctively forces them to extend their arms laterally and press down on the water’s surface. Pressing down on the surface of the water permits drowning people to leverage their bodies so they can lift their mouths out of the water to breathe.
  4. Throughout the Instinctive Drowning Response, drowning people cannot voluntarily control their arm movements. Physiologically, drowning people who are struggling on the surface of the water cannot stop drowning and perform voluntary movements such as waving for help, moving toward a rescuer, or reaching out for a piece of rescue equipment.
  5. From beginning to end of the Instinctive Drowning Response people’s bodies remain upright in the water, with no evidence of a supporting kick. Unless rescued by a trained lifeguard, these drowning people can only struggle on the surface of the water from 20 to 60 seconds before submersion occurs.”
This doesn’t mean that a person that is yelling for help and thrashing isn’t in real trouble—they are experiencing aquatic distress. Not always present before the Instinctive Drowning Response, aquatic distress doesn’t last long—but unlike true drowning, these victims can still assist in their own rescue. They can grab lifelines, throw rings, etc.
Look for these other signs of drowning when persons are in the water:
  • Head low in the water, mouth at water level
  • Head tilted back with mouth open
  • Eyes glassy and empty, unable to focus
  • Eyes closed
  • Hair over forehead or eyes
  • Not using legs—vertical
  • Hyperventilating or gasping
  • Trying to swim in a particular direction but not making headway
  • Trying to roll over on the back
  • Appear to be climbing an invisible ladder
So if a crew member falls overboard and everything looks OK—don’t be too sure. Sometimes the most common indication that someone is drowning is that they don’t look like they’re drowning. They may just look like they are treading water and looking up at the deck. One way to be sure? Ask them, “Are you all right?” If they can answer at all—they probably are. If they return a blank stare, you may have less than 30 seconds to get to them. And parents—children playing in the water make noise. When they get quiet, you get to them and find out why.

This article is reprinted from Mario Vittone’s blog. Join him on Facebook.

Correction, June 5, 2013: This article originally cited a CDC statistic in referring to the number of child drownings in which a nearby adult watches the child with no idea a drowning is occurring. According to the CDC's Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, no CDC studies have measured the number of such occurrences. The reference has been removed. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil Petre
Phone: (918) 649-7555
email: philpetre@gmail.com

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Bradlee Dean: The Father Of ADHD Calls Himself A Liar

Dr. Leon Eisenberg at the Julius Richmond 90th Birthday Symposiu“ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease.”
These were the words of Leon Eisenberg, the “scientific father of ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder),” in his last interview before his death.

Leon Eisenberg made a luxurious living off of his “fictitious disease,” thanks to pharmaceutical sales. Coincidentally, he received the “Ruane Prize for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research. He has been a leader in child psychiatry for more than 40 years through his work in pharmacological trials, research, teaching, and social policy and for his theories of autism and social medicine,” according to Psychiatric News.

Yes, it was even admitted that they are his THEORIES. The medical industry is using the guise of helping children to depersonalize and disconnect our children from a healthy, normal upbringing. Parents are placing their children on these drugs and subjecting them to what the world has to offer, when in fact all these children are looking for is their parents in hopes of being the blessing that God intended them to be.

In the United States, 1 out of 10 boys among 10-year-olds takes medication for ADHD on a daily basis … with increasing tendency. And with the help of Teen Screen surveys in public schools, they are attempting to set up the student for the fall.

American psychologist Lisa Cosgrove and others reveal the facts in their study “Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry.” They found that “Of the 170 DSM panel members 95 (56 percent) had one or more financial associations with companies in the pharmaceutical industry. One hundred percent of the members of the panels on ‘Mood Disorders’ and ‘Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders’ had financial ties to drug companies.”

And they are reaping major benefits off of this “fictitious disease.” For example, the assistant director of the Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital and associate professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School received “$1 million in earnings from drug companies between 2000 and 2007.”
Marc-André Gagnon and Joel Lexchin, a long-time researcher of pharmaceutical promotion, performed a study which shows that the U.S. pharmaceutical industry spent 24.4 percent of the sales dollar on promotion, versus 13.4 percent for research and development in 2004. That is almost twice as much money on pushing their drugs on the people than research to make sure it is safe!

This raises the following question: Are they safe?
Read the antidepressant black-box warning for yourselves, and you will be alarmed by the side effects listed on the inserts:
  • Confusion
  • Depersonalization
  • Hostility
  • Hallucinations
  • Manic reactions
  • Suicidal ideation
  • Loss of consciousness
  • Delusions
  • Feeling drunk
  • Alcohol abuse
  • Homicidal ideation
Why would any parent subject their children to drugs with such dangerous side effects? Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn, a founding member of the Royal College of General Practitioners, in 1998 stated, “ADHD is fraud intended to justify starting children on a life of drug addiction.”

The “attention deficit” lies in the responsibility of the parents, not the child. Scripture tells us that the parent is to “train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it (Proverbs 22:6),” not the other way around.

To take it a step further, the video below explores what is being overlooked – namely, the alarming studies linking antidepressants to mass murder:


Who is Bradlee Dean?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil Petre
Phone: (918) 649-7555
email: philpetre@gmail.com

Friday, April 19, 2013

The Story Behind Dove’s Mega Viral “Real Beauty Sketches” Campaign



Anselmo Ramos, creative lead on Dove’s "Real Beauty Sketches" hit discusses the making of a viral sensation. Dove’s “ the [i]New York Times[/i], ABC News, this very site, and in the Huffington Post, where a positive piece about the campaign has been shared almost 40,000 times on Facebook. It has inspired a parody of the original, and now even the blogger backlash to the ad--which complains that it focuses too much on a narrow definition of beauty--has itself gone viral. It’s a real mark of Internet success when even your backlash gets press.




If you haven’t seen it already here or elsewhere, the ad depicts an FBI forensic artist named Gil Zamora sketching women (that he can’t see) by the way they describe themselves. He says things like, "Tell me about your chin," to which these women depressingly reply, “It kind of protrudes a little bit, especially when I smile,” or "My mom told me I had a big jaw." Then strangers sit down and describe these same women to Zamora. The resulting sketches—the ones based on strangers’ descriptions—are ultimately more attractive and look more like their subjects than the ones based on self-description. The idea is that women are too critical of themselves. The tagline: “YOU are more beautiful than you think!”

Anselmo Ramos, a vice president and creative director at Ogilvy Brazil, is one of the key creatives behind this ad--as well as other ingenious creations, like the ad featuring a karaoke mic doubling as a breathalyzer as a way to combat drunk driving. He spoke to us about the inspiration behind the real beauty sketches and how these videos were made. “Everything is a conversation really,” Ramos says of his creative philosophy. “Consumers are ready to engage with brands. We just need to entertain them.”



The Origin of the Idea

We got a simple and ambitious brief from our clients: Make women feel better about themselves. Back in 2007, when Dove won the Cannes Grand Prix with “Evolution,” the “Real Beauty” concept was a completely different point of view from the entire beauty industry. Now that the Campaign for Real Beauty has been established, our job was to talk straight to women in a more intimate, personal way. According to statistics, only 4% of women feel good about themselves across the globe. We decided to do something that would move the other 96%. From the very beginning, we tried to look for an idea that could actually prove they are wrong about their self-image. An experiment. We had several ideas, but “Real Beauty Sketches” really stood out. There’s a lot of merit to the clients, because they didn’t approve a script; they approved a social experiment.

Was There A Back-up Plan?

We always say that if you know exactly what you’re doing, then probably you’re not doing something really new. We like to come up with ideas that a) haven’t been done before, and b) we have no idea how the heck we’ll do it. With “Real Beauty Sketches,” we thought that women would probably describe themselves in a more negative way than strangers. But it was just a guess really, based on common sense and women’s nature. It could go totally wrong. When we told the idea to the clients, we said: “Listen, this is the idea. We don’t know if it’s going to work, but we think it will. The only way to find out is by doing it.” So there’s a lot of merit to the clients, because they didn’t approve a script; they approved a social experiment.

Finding the Best Artist Around



We did an extensive research to find the best sketch artist out there. When we found Gil Zamora, and he told us about his drawing technique by asking questions, and we saw his style and personality, we knew we’d found the right guy. He got really excited about the project and he was crucial for the campaign. There’s something really powerful when you bring together two elements from completely different worlds: an FBI-trained sketch artist and women’s self-esteem.

Casting the Women

The participants where selected through a normal casting session. We looked for women from different ages and ethnicities. And women that could represent well Dove’s concept of “Real Beauty.” The strangers were also selected through casting. The goal was to find nice, easygoing, outspoken people, who could quickly befriend someone and would be able to describe that person later.



Directing the Shoot

The shoot took three days in a loft in San Francisco. Gil would draw a woman describing herself in a day and then draw the stranger describing the same women on a different day. Gil would never really know who exactly he was drawing. The project was shot by John X Carey from Paranoid US. He was the perfect director for the project. He shot it in a beautiful documentary-style way, capturing all the right emotions on camera.

Why It Went Viral



I think it went viral because it moves you, because it makes you think, because it’s based on a true insight. Most ads today don’t evoke any clear emotion, they just communicate a particular product or service benefit. We wanted to do something really emotional. Most women cry when they watch it. But not only women; men, too, because they think about their mothers, sisters, and daughters. I myself cried several times. We knew we had something good in our hands, but yes, we are a little surprised by how fast it went viral. We love it when something we do gets talked about beyond advertising trade publications, by magazines like Fast Company. We also love it when people make the concept their own, by making spoofs and parodies. The “Men: You’re Less Beautiful Than You Think” spoof is really funny.

Responding to Critics Who Say Their Definition of Beauty is Too Narrow

I think the project is pretty diverse. We had Caucasian, African-American, Asian women participating. Like always, we’ve used the best bits, the best moments in terms of editing and to make our point. If 99% of people like it, I think it’s fine. There will always be someone that will say something, no matter what you do. What really matters is that people are spreading quickly the message of "Women: You’re More Beautiful Than You Think." And I think it’s an important and necessary message to put out there. We feel really good about it. Because right now, some woman, somewhere, is watching this film and feeling better about herself.



Monday, April 15, 2013

RUN FROM http://www.Spirit.com or http://www.Spiritair.com


The Public needs to know a few things before booking a cheap airline ticket through Spirit Airlines( http://www.Spirit.com or http://www.spiritair.com ). What they don't tell you until you are ready to check in is that there is a bag charge even for carry on bags.

Example: One week ago I flew Delta and my laptop bag was considered my personal bag and I was allowed one carry-on in addtion. So I had my suitcase and rolling laptop bag that both went for free as carry-ons. Not with Spirit! Not only do they charge you $45 for a checked bag going underneath, but they charge you $50 for a carry-on. You are allowed one personal item.... maybe!

So I was told my rolling laptop bag is too big to be a personal item. So we had 2 suitcases, a bag of food items we were taking for someone else and my computer bag. They charged us $190 because all of our bags were too big for personal items. AFTER charging us, they decided that the computer bag is a personal item after all but... "So sorry the bag charge is NON-Refundable"!

We opted to drive to Dallas, spend a night at the motel because we were leaving early all because the tickets were so much cheaper only to find out that we have to pay $190 extra for bags. We could have flown out of Ft Smith AR for about the same amount of money taking into consideration of the motel and parking and the exorbitant bags fees that we are paying in addition to our cheap Spirit tickets that are now not so cheap.

I said to my wife, this is the last time I will fly Spirit and the lady ahead of me turned around and said I agree. People were not happy because they were not told that carry-ons were not free when they booked their tickets so there was ticket counter drama and a long slow wait to get boarding passes and to check in our bags. Spirit just lost several customers and I will discourage everyone from flying on them until they change their policies.

Then we get to the gate and they are repairing the plane and our flight is expected to leave 3+ hours later than scheduled... UGH

SPIRIT AIRLINES, YOU SHOULD REMEMBER AN UNHAPPY CUSTOMER IS NOT GOOD AND A BUNCH OF UNHAPPY CUSTOMERS IS REALLY NOT GOOD.

 The general public shoukld be aware that Spirit tickets are NOT cheaper at all once they are finished gigging you for all of the bag fees.

Phil Petre
(918) 649-7555
philpetre@gmail.com

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Gas Prices under Bush

Oh for the good ole days.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil M. Petre is a successful Entrepreneur & Businessman who has worked from home for years! He and his wife Brenda, home school their 7 wonderful kids while living in beautiful rural Oklahoma. Phil has the $20K System that he & his team has recently launched in their opportunity! To get more info about how to participate with or keep in contact with Phil, contact him at the info below: 

Phone: (918) 649-7555
e-Mail: philpetre@gmail.com
Follow Me on Pinterest

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

WHY WE SHOOT DEER IN THE WILD


 
 (A letter from someone who wants to remain anonymous, who farms, writes well and actually tried this)

I had this idea that I could rope a deer, put it in a stall, feed it up on corn for a couple of weeks, then kill it and eat it. The first step in this adventure was getting a deer. I figured that, since they congregate at my cattle feeder and do not seem to have much fear of me when we are there (a bold one will sometimes come right up and sniff at the bags of feed while I am in the back of the truck not 4 feet away), it should not be difficult to rope one, get up to it and toss a bag over its head (to calm it down) then hog tie it and transport it home.

I filled the cattle feeder then hid down at the end with my rope. The cattle, having seen the roping thing before, stayed well back. They were not having any of it. After about 20 minutes, my deer showed up-- 3 of them. I picked out a likely looking one, stepped out from the end of the feeder, and threw my rope. The deer just stood there and stared at me. I wrapped the rope around my waist and twisted the end so I would have a good hold.

The deer still just stood and stared at me, but you could tell it was mildly concerned about the whole rope situation. I took a step towards it, it took a step away. I put a little tension on the rope, and then received an education. The first thing that I learned is that, while a deer may just stand there looking at you funny while you rope it, they are spurred to action when you start pulling on that rope.

That deer EXPLODED. The second thing I learned is that pound for pound, a deer is a LOT stronger than a cow or a colt. A cow or a colt in that weight range I could fight down with a rope and with some dignity. A deer-- no Chance. That thing ran and bucked and twisted and pulled. There was no controlling it and certainly no getting close to it. As it jerked me off my feet and started dragging me across the ground, it occurred to me that having a deer on a rope was not nearly as good an idea as I had originally imagined. The only upside is that they do not have as much stamina as many other animals.

A brief 10 minutes later, it was tired and not nearly as quick to jerk me off my feet and drag me when I managed to get up. It took me a few minutes to realize this, since I was mostly blinded by the blood flowing out of the big gash in my head. At that point, I had lost my taste for corn-fed venison. I just wanted to get that devil creature off the end of that rope.

I figured if I just let it go with the rope hanging around its neck, it would likely die slow and painfully somewhere. At the time, there was no love at all between me and that deer. At that moment, I hated the thing, and I would venture a guess that the feeling was mutual. Despite the gash in my head and the several large knots where I had cleverly arrested the deer's momentum by bracing my head against various large rocks as it dragged me across the ground, I could still think clearly enough to recognize that there was a small chance that I shared some tiny amount of responsibility for the situation we were in. I didn't want the deer to have to suffer a slow death, so I managed to get it lined back up in between my truck and the feeder - a little trap I had set before hand...kind of like a squeeze chute. I got it to back in there and I started moving up so I could get my rope back.

Did you know that deer bite? They do! I never in a million years would have thought that a deer would bite somebody, so I was very surprised when ..... I reached up there to grab that rope and the deer grabbed hold of my wrist. Now, when a deer bites you, it is not like being bit by a horse where they just bite you and slide off to then let go. A deer bites you and shakes its head--almost like a pit bull. They bite HARD and it hurts.

The proper thing to do when a deer bites you is probably to freeze and draw back slowly. I tried screaming and shaking instead. My method was ineffective.

It seems like the deer was biting and shaking for several minutes, but it was likely only several seconds. I, being smarter than a deer (though you may be questioning that claim by now), tricked it. While I kept it busy tearing the tendons out of my right arm, I reached up with my left hand and pulled that rope loose.

That was when I got my final lesson in deer behavior for the day.

Deer will strike at you with their front feet. They rear right up on their back feet and strike right about head and shoulder level, and their hooves are surprisingly sharp... I learned a long time ago that, when an animal -like a horse --strikes at you with their hooves and you can't get away easily, the best thing to do is try to make a loud noise and make an aggressive move towards the animal. This will usually cause them to back down a bit so you can escape.

This was not a horse. This was a deer, so obviously, such trickery would not work. In the course of a millisecond, I devised a different strategy. I screamed like a woman and tried to turn and run. The reason I had always been told NOT to try to turn and run from a horse that paws at you is that there is a good chance that it will hit you in the back of the head. Deer may not be so different from horses after all, besides being twice as strong and 3 times as evil, because the second I turned to run, it hit me right in the back of the head and knocked me down.

Now, when a deer paws at you and knocks you down, it does not immediately leave. I suspect it does not recognize that the danger has passed. What they do instead is paw your back and jump up and down on you while you are laying there crying like a little girl and covering your head.

I finally managed to crawl under the truck and the deer went away. So now I know why when people go deer hunting they bring a rifle with a scope......to sort of even the odds!!

All these events are true so help me God...An Educated Farmer
Borrowed from https://www.facebook.com/joel.johnson.75839
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil M. Petre is a successful Entrepreneur & Businessman who has worked from home for years! He and his wife Brenda, home school their 7 wonderful kids while living in beautiful rural Oklahoma. Phil has the $20K System that he & his team has recently launched in their opportunity! To get more info about how to participate with or keep in contact with Phil, contact him at the info below: 
 
Follow Me on Pinterest

Sunday, March 3, 2013

It’s OK to Kill Your Children but Not Educate Them

SwedenHomeschoolingLogo_small2 

A number of countries are clamping down on family education of children, better known as homeschooling. Parents decide to educate their children in the home instead of sending them off to a government institution or a private school that must adhere to specific state educational guidelines.
Free-sex Sweden is notorious for denying parents the right to educate their children at home. A woman can kill her pre-born baby up until the eighteenth week of pregnancy for any reason, but if she decides to give birth, the State controls her child’s education.

Rabbi Alexander Namdar and his wife Leah decided to educate their children at home “to ensure that their instruction ran parallel to their Jewish beliefs. Just weeks after an appellate judge’s verdict supported the parents’ right to homeschool their five children, Swedish government officials challenged the decision.”The Namdars won their battle with the State, but the media and leftist political groups denounced the court decision.
Then there’s the story of Annie and Christer Johansson who had their parental rights terminated in regard to their son, Domenic. “The boy and his parents were on board a jetliner minutes from departing Sweden for Annie’s home country of India when Domenic was seized in June 2009. The reason authorities initially gave for taking Domenic was that he had been homeschooled.“During subsequent medical evaluations, Domenic was found to have missed some vaccinations and ‘had cavities’ in his teeth.“During the first months following his seizure the parents were only permitted to visit Domenic once every two weeks. This quickly became once every five weeks, and in 2010 all visitations were cut off.” 
Other Swedish homeschooling families have fled the country when officials threatened to levy massive fines against the parents and retaliate by way of social service directives that don’t need court-ordered permission to remove children from so-called abusive homes.

Now we are learning that the German government is clamping down on homeschooling families. In 1938, homeschooling was outlawed in Germany  by Adolf Hitler. Given what we know, the law was never rescinded, and the German government is taking full advantage of the Nazi-era law. The German Supreme Court has banned homeschooling to “counteract the development of religious and philosophically motivated parallel societies.” Germany wants State-sanctioned conformity. Mussolini described modern-day fascistic governments like Sweden and Germany: “Everything for the State; nothing outside the State; nothing against the State.”

It’s always been the dream of tyrannical governments to eliminate all competitive thought. Adolf Hitler understood it better than anybody. The following is from William L. Shirer’s The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich:
“When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ [Adolf Hitler] said in a speech on November 6, 1933, “I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already. . . . What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.’” And on May 1, 1937, [Hitler] declared, “This new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”[1]

There is still freedom to educate our children outside the government system. It’s too bad that more parents aren’t taking advantage of that freedom. Why are young people adopting a liberal, politically progressive ideology today? Because they’ve been taught to think this way for the greater part of their young life – 6 hours each day, 5 days a week, 10 months of every year for 12 years.

If you want to change the direction of America, get them out of the government schools before you can’t.

Notes:
  1. William Shirer, Rise and Fall of the Third Reich New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960), 249.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/9694/its-ok-to-kill-your-children-but-not-educate-them/#ixzz2MW87szph

Thursday, February 7, 2013

2013 Inaugaral Prayer Breakfast Sermon

I believe we as Christians are called to pray and preach the truth & fight God's battles for the heavenly  
kingdom. Therefore when I heard that the minister that was asked to speak was actually a Messianic Rabbi who stood for biblical principals & salvation through Jesus Christ and I received an email asking me to write and encourage him to use his time at the 2013 inaugural prayer breakfast to preach repentance, I did so. You can see the email below in bold red print that I sent him and the response I got back. 
I am sharing this with you for several reasons.
  1. Because I believe it affects how we should be praying for our country's leaders!
  2. Our President has been told the truth of God's word so we should pray that the powers of darkness that is obviously at work is bound in the name of Jesus so God's Spirit speak to Mr. Obama.
  3. Also pray for protection & safety for Pastor Cahn. Satan cannot be ok with what he said to the President and other leaders of our country.
Now after reading the email correspondence between Cahns office & I, scroll down and click the picture below to watch the video of the actual sermon. I just cried as I listened because it ministered to my own heart but also because President Obama will NEVER be able say he didn't know! I thank God for faithful prophets in the land. it has been taken down from YouTube several times I understand, so do a favor, pass this on to everyone you know so they too can pray.



From: "Phil Petre" <goldenrulenetwork@juno.com>
To: <office@bethisraelworshipcenter.org>
Subject: TESHUVAH: Inaugural Prayer Breakfast
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:45:55 -0600
Dear Rabbi,
am writing because of the times we live in and the opportunity you have before you to be the keynote speaker at the inaugural breakfast, to urge you too call America to a place of repentance. Repentance for the shedding of the innocent blood of millions of unborn babies, the sins of homosexuality and more, peradventure like Israel of old, when they repented that God would have mercy on them, so He would have mercy on us!
We are also praying for you that you would through the power of the Holy Spirit preach an anointed message that would bring forth repentance.
--
Sincerely
Phil M Petre
Of: (918) 653-7312
Cell: (918) 649-7555
Skype: GoldenruleGroup-Phil.Petre
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~


From: office [mailto:office@bethisraelworshipcenter.org]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 8:11 PM
To: Phil Petre
Subject: re: TESHUVAH: Inaugural Prayer Breakfast

Greetings and Blessings in Yeshua’s Name,

Jonathan wanted me to thank you for your e-mail and your encouraging words. That’s exactly what he plans to speak about –a call to repentance.
He asks for your prayers.

God bless you,

Sharon Krahn
Hope of the Wordl


Please don't print this e-mail unless really necessary- Save a tree
Sharon Krahn,Office Administrator 

The Jerusalem Center/Beth Israel
11 Railroad Av
Wayne, NJ 07470
973 709-9466 ext 7







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Phil Petre pastors a church in OK and loves to see the kingdom of God advancing in the last days. Feel free to make contact with him at the contact info below. 

Phil Petre
Of (918) 653-7312 or Cell: (918)649-7555
Email: PhilPetre@gmail.com 

Monday, January 21, 2013

China poised to play debt card – for U.S. land

Phil Petre - 1/21/13

Am I the only one this bothers?? Are the Chinese going to controlled territory inside America?The Chinese and Australians are spending $350 Million and opening a coal mine shaft less than a mile from my house in Oklahoma.  Is IDAHO soon to be the first Chinese state in USA?
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

obamachinesetroops


 
EDITOR’S NOTE: Barack Obama’s involvement in the DeMar Second Amendment case was previously reported in Chapter 7 of Jerome R. Corsi’s “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty.”

NEW YORK – Could real estate on American soil owned by China be set up as “development zones” in which the communist nation could establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work?

That’s part of an evolving proposal Beijing has been developing quietly since 2009 to convert more than $1 trillion of U.S debt it owns into equity. Under the plan, China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss. Yu Qiao, a professor of economics in the School of Public Policy and Management at Tsighua University in Beijing, proposed in 2009 a plan for the U.S. government to guarantee foreign investments in the United States.

WND has reliable information that the Bank of China, China’s central bank, has continued to advance the plan to convert China’s holdings of U.S. debt into equity owned by China in the U.S.
The Obama administration, under the plan, would grant a financial guarantee as an inducement for China to convert U.S. debt into Chinese direct equity investment. China would take ownership of successful U.S. corporations, potentially profitable infrastructure projects and high-value U.S. real estate.

Jerome Corsi exposes the globalists’ plan to put America on the chopping block in “America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty,” available at WND’s Superstore.

The plan would be designed to induce China to resume lending to the U.S. on a nearly zero-interest basis. However, converting Chinese debt to equity investments in the United States could easily add another $1 trillion to outstanding Obama administration guarantees issued in the current economic crisis. As of November 2012, China owned $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to U.S. Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve Board calculations published Jan. 16.

Concerned about the unrestrained growth in U.S. debt under the Obama administration, China has reduced by 97 percent its holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. China’s holding of $573.7 billion in August 2008, prior to the massive bank bailouts and stimulus programs triggered by the collapse in the U.S. mortgage market, dwindled to $5.96 billion by March 2011.

Treasury bills are short-term debt that matures in one year or less, sold to finance U.S. debt. Holdings of Treasury bills are included in the $1.17 trillion of total Treasury securities owned by China as of November 2012.

In addition to a national debt in excess of $16 trillion, the U.S. government in 2010 faced over $70 trillion in unfunded obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits scheduled to be paid retiring baby boomer retirees in the coming decades, with unfunded obligations showing no sign of being reduced with Congress at a deadlock over reducing federal government spending.

Yu Qiao observed that if the U.S. dollar collapsed under the weight of proposed Obama administration trillion-dollar budget deficits into the foreseeable future, holders of U.S. debt would face substantial losses that the Financial Times estimated “would devastate Asians’ hard-earned wealth and terminate economic globalization.”

“The basic idea is to turn Asian savings, China’s in particular, into real business interests rather than let them be used to support U.S. over-consumption,” Yu Qiao wrote, reflecting themes commonly suggested by Chinese government officials. “While fixed-income securities are vulnerable to any fall in the value of the dollar, equity claims on sound corporations and infrastructure projects are at less risk from a currency default,” he continued.

The problem is that, in a struggling U.S. economy, China does not want to trade its investment in U.S. Treasury debt securities, with their inherent risk of dollar devaluation, for equally risky investments in U.S. corporations and infrastructure projects.

“But Asians do not want to bear the risk of this investment because of market turbulence and a lack of knowledge of cultural, legal and regulatory issues in U.S. businesses,” he stressed. “However if a guarantee scheme were created, Asian savers could be willing to invest directly in capital-hungry U.S. industries.”

Yu Qiao’s plan included four components:
  1. China would negotiate with the U.S. government to create a “crisis relief facility,” or CRF. The CRF “would be used alongside U.S. federal efforts to stabilize the banking system and to invest in capital-intensive infrastructure projects such as high-speed railroad from Boston to Washington, D.C.
  2. China would pool a portion of its holdings of Treasury bonds under the CFR umbrella to convert sovereign debt into equity. Any CFR funds that were designated for investment in U.S. corporations would still be owned and managed by U.S. equity holders, with the Asians holding minority equity shares “that would, like preferred stock, be convertible.”
  3. The U.S. government would act as a guarantor, “providing a sovereign guarantee scheme to assure the investment principal of the CRF against possible default of targeted companies or projects”.
  4. The Federal Reserve would set up a special account to supply the liquidity the CRF would require to swap sovereign debt into industrial investment in the United States.
“The CRF would lessen Asians’ concern about implicit default of sovereign debts caused by a collapsing dollar,” Yu Qiao concluded. “It would cost little and help the U.S. by channeling funds to business investment.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/china-poised-to-play-debt-card-for-u-s-land/#uMSXkHRytsUyE6oF.99

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil M. Petre is a successful Entrepreneur & businessman who has worked from home for years! He & his wife Brenda, home school their 7 kids while living in beautiful rural Oklahoma. To find out more about what Phil does to work from home , CLICK HERE.

He can also be reached at: philpetre@gmailcom 
 

Monday, January 14, 2013

Are Guns?? Teachers?? or Drugs?? ...threats to our kids!

OK Folks. I hate to write about this stuff but every day I am bombarded with propaganda as to why lawful Americans should no longer be allowed to own firearms or why the 2nd amendment should be done away with. So check this out and think about it realistically not out of reaction.

Who really are  responsible for the problems behind why people use guns to kill others? The truth will set you free IF you study facts. Here are some facts for a number of chilling instances - you can click on the link that says the kind of shooting and read for yourself on each of these terrible things that people have done. A sane person with a gun doesn't go around hurting others.Just like a sane teacher doesn't sexually abuse kids, yet we have a big list of teachers who are preying on kids. Why don't we outlaw teachers along with guns? Because teachers aren't the problem. Neither are guns the problem.

Today at the Coffee shop, the Cartoon Network was on the TV and in 20 min. I saw houses & yes people being blown up with dynamite etc etc. Violence was the main theme... our nation's kids feed on this stuff. The video games, the cartoons and too many movies are full of violence towards people... and then they are drugged to make them "normal". We end up creating monsters, while padding the pockets of lobbyists, politicians, gaming and drug companies.

The facts speak for themselves.


Prozac WITHDRAWAL
2008-02-15
Illinois
** 6 Dead: 15 Wounded: Perpetrator Was in Withdrawal from Med & Acting Erratically
Prozac Antidepressant
2005-03-24
Minnesota
**10 Dead: 7 Wounded: Dosage Increased One Week before Rampage
Paxil [Seroxat] Antidepressant
2001-03-10
Pennsylvania
**14 Year Old GIRL Shoots & Wounds Classmate at Catholic School
Zoloft Antidepressant & ADHD Med
2011-07-11
Alabama
**14 Year Old Kills Fellow Middle School Student
Zoloft Antidepressant
1995-10-12
South Carolina
**15 Year Old Shoots Two Teachers, Killing One: Then Kills Himself
Med For Depression
2009-03-13
Germany
**16 Dead Including Shooter: Antidepressant Use: Shooter in Treatment For Depression
Med For Depression
2010-12-15
France
**17 Year Old with Sword Holds 20 Children & Teacher Hostage
Med For Depression WITHDRAWAL
2008-08-28
Texas
**18 Year Old Plots a Columbine School Attack
Anafranil Antidepressant
1988-05-20
Illinois
**29 Year Old WOMAN Kills One Child: Wounds Five: Kills Self
Luvox/Zoloft Antidepressants
1999-04-20
Colorado
**COLUMBINE: 15 Dead: 24 Wounded
Antidepressants
2001-06-09
Japan
**Eight Dead: 15 Wounded: Assailant Had Taken 10 Times his Normal Dose of Depression Med
Prozac Antidepressant WITHDRAWAL
1998-05-21
Oregon
**Four Dead: Twenty Injured
Med For Depression
2011-10-25
Washington
**Girl, 15, Stabs Two Girls in School Restroom: 1 Is In Critical Condition
Antidepressant
2006-09-30
Colorado
**Man Assaults Girls: Kills One & Self
Med for Depression
2001-09-26
Pennsylvania
**Man Attacks 11 Children & 3 Teachers at Elementary School
Luvox
1993-07-23
Florida
**Man Commits Murder During Clinical Trial for Luvox: Same Drug as in COLUMBINE: Never Reported
Cymbalta Antidepressant WITHDRAWAL
2009-11-09
New York
**Man With Gun Inside School Holds Principal Hostage
Antidepressants
1992-09-20
Texas
**Man, Angry Over Daughter's Report Card, Shoots 14 Rounds inside Elementary School
SSRI
2010-02-19
Finland
**On Sept. 23, 2008 a Finnish Student Shot & Killed 9 Students Before Killing Himself
Med for Depression*
2004-10-19
New Jersey
**Over-Medicated Teen Brings Loaded Handguns to School
Antidepressant?
2007-04-18
Virginia
**Possible SSRI Use: 33 Dead at Virginia Tech
Antidepressant?
2002-01-17
Virginia
**Possible SSRI Withdrawal Mania: 3 Dead at Law School
Zoloft*
2010-08-22
Australia
**School Counselor Exhibits Bizarre Behavior: Became Manic On Zoloft
Antidepressant
2009-11-04
California
**School Custodian Assaults Student & Principal: Had Manic Reaction From Depression Med
Prozac Antidepressant
1992-01-30
Michigan
**School Teacher Shoots & Kills His Superintendent at School
Celexa Antidepressant
2010-01-25
Virginia
**Senior in High School Theatens to Kill 4 Classmates: Facebook Involved: Bail Denied
Antidepressants*
1998-05-04
New York
**Sheriff's Deputy Shoots his Wife in an Elementary School
Meds For Depression & ADHD
2010-04-28
Massachusetts
**Sixteen Year Old Kills 15 Year Old in High School Bathroom in Sept. 2009
Wellbutrin
2006-12-04
Indiana
**Stabbing by 17 Year Old At High School: Charged with Attempted Murder
Antidepressants
2007-04-23
Mississippi
**Student Arrested for Making School Threat Over Internet
Lexapro Antidepressant
2007-07-28
Arkansas
**Student Has 11 Incidents with Police During his 16 Months on Lexapro
Antidepressant WITHDRAWAL
2007-11-07
Finland
**Student Kills 8: Wounds 10: Kills Self: High School in Finland
Paxil [Seroxat] Antidepressant
2004-02-09
New York
**Student Shoots Teacher in Leg at School
Prozac Antidepressant
2008-01-25
Washington
**Student Takes Loaded Shotgun & 3 Rifles to School Parking Lot: Plans Suicide
Med For Depression
1998-12-01
Wisconsin
**Teen Accused of Plotting to Gun Down Students at School
Zoloft Antidepressant
2006-02-15
Tennessee
**Teen Attacks Teacher at School
Antidepressant
1999-04-16
Idaho
**Teen Fires Gun in School
Paxil & Effexor Antidepressants
2001-04-15
Washington
**Teen Holds Classmates Hostage with a Gun
Antidepressant WITHDRAWAL
2006-11-28
North Carolina
**Teen Holds Teacher & Student Hostage with Gun
Med for Depression
2006-12-06
Indiana
**Teen Knife Attacks Fellow Student
Prozac Withdrawal
2011-02-23
Virginia
**Teen Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison For Columbine Style Plot
Celexa & Effexor Antidepressants
2001-04-19
California
**Teen Shoots at Classmates in School
Celexa Antidepressant
2006-08-30
North Carolina
**Teen Shoots at Two Students: Kills his Father: Celexa Found Among his Personal Effects
Meds For Depression & ADHD
2011-03-18
South Carolina
**Teen Shoots School Official: Pipe Bombs Found in Backpack
Antidepressant
2003-05-31
Michigan
**Teen Threatens School Shooting: Charge is Terrorism
Zoloft Antidepressant
1998-04-13
Idaho
**Teen [14 Years Old] in School Holds Police At Bay: Fires Shots
Antidepressant WITHDRAWAL
2007-10-12
Ohio
**Teen [14 Years Old] School Shooter Possibly on Antidepressants or In Withdrawal
Antidepressants
2008-03-20
Indiana
**Teen [16 Years Old] Brings Gun to School: There Is a Lockdown
Med For Depression
2008-02-20
Idaho
**Teen [16 Years Old] Kills Self at High School: Lockdown by Police
Prozac Antidepressant
1999-10-19
Florida
**Teen [16 Years Old] Threatens Classmates With Knife & Fake Explosives
Med For Depression
2008-02-29
Texas
**Teen [17 Year Old GIRL] Stabs Friend & Principal at High School
Prozac/ Paxil Antidepressants
2001-01-18
California
**Teen [17 Years Old] Takes Girl Hostage at School: He is Killed by Police
Treatment For Depression & Strattera
2009-03-10
Belgium
**Three Dead in School Day Care: Two Children & a Caregiver: Happened Jan 23, 2009
Antidepressants
2009-09-22
England
**Two English School Boys Plot to Blow Up High School
Paxil
2002-04-12
Michigan
**Unusual Personality Change on Paxil Caused 15 Year Old to Set Fires inside High School
Med For Depression
2009-06-29
Australia
**Vexed Father Makes Bomb Threat Against Elementary School
Antidepressant
2005-11-19
Arizona
**Violent 8 Year Old GIRL Handcuffed by Police at School
Celexa Antidepressant
2002-01-23
Florida
**Violent 8 Year-Old Boy Arrested At School
Lexapro*
2008-04-18
California
**Violent High School Student Shot to Death on Campus by Police
Antidepressants
2008-02-27
Canada
**Wacky School Bus Driver Goes Berserk: Also Involved Painkillers
Paxil
2004-10-23
Washington DC
**Young Boy, 10 Year Old, Has Violent Incidents at School
Wellbutrin Antidepressant
2007-04-24
Tennessee
**Young Boy, 12, Threatens to Shoot Others at School
Med for Depression
2006-03-09
France
**Young Ex-Teacher Holds 21 Students Hostage
Celexa
2002-10-07
Texas
**Young Girl [13 Years Old] Kills Self at School With a Gun
Paxil
2001-10-12
North Carolina
**Young Man Holds Three People Hostage in Duke University President's Office
Med For Depression
1995-03-04
California
**Young Woman Deliberately Hits 3 Kids with Her Car at Elementary School: Laughed During Attack

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phil M. Petre is a successful Entrepreneur & businessman who has worked from home for years! He & his wife Brenda, home school their 7 kids while living in beautiful rural Oklahoma. To find out more about what Phil does to work from home , CLICK HERE.

He can also be reached at: philpetre@gmailcom